The governor of Nuevo León’s daughter is now eating solids. While this may sound trivial to some, for others it represents a matter of national importance. The way Mariana Rodríguez and Samuel García feed their baby draws attention, sparks debates, and generates criticism and discussion—a reflection of several societal aspects related not only to food, but also to the prototypes of motherhood and fatherhood with which society identifies or rejects.
The issue of Mariel had already sparked controversy when she was a newborn, as her first-time parents posted a photo where the father was giving her an electrolyte solution. This image stirred up concern among pediatric nutrition specialists and some parents, who pointed out that colostrum (the mother’s milk in the first days) is essential for babies and that giving them electrolyte solutions is contraindicated.
Now, the baby has reached a developmental milestone by being exposed for the first time to solid foods—one of the most significant events in a person’s dietary history. Criticism was immediate, ranging from Mariel’s age (5 months) to why Mariana dared to give her a solid food like avocado.
All these aspects provoke so much controversy that they make us question why a baby’s diet can generate such heated debates. Millions of mothers and fathers around the world face daily dilemmas about parenting, nutrition, health, and baby care. From exclusive breastfeeding, delayed breastfeeding, mixed feeding, and formula feeding; from sleep training in a crib to co-sleeping at night, respectful parenting, and many other topics that cause anxiety for many parents. Why, then, if these are situations faced by thousands every day, is so much importance given to what a baby eats? Some say Mariana’s influencer power makes her a spokesperson for various causes and can influence other mothers to follow her steps in different matters.
But beyond the influence she might exert, the truth is that behind all these issues—seeking only the best way to raise a child—lie our high expectations for perfect motherhood and fatherhood, where someone feels like a “better person” for choosing a particular feeding method or for being over-informed about all the options. Ideas about motherhood are still anchored in many patriarchal aspects, where a woman’s moral quality is determined by how she raises her children. Since children don’t give public opinions, but peers who observe do, mothers are always placed under public scrutiny that doesn’t forgive subtle or complex information. In this matter, popular belief is that there are always absolutes (such as whether or not to feed a baby before six months), without nuances, without considering individualities, and moreover, everyone believes themselves to be the spokesperson for the truth and the best way to raise a child.
— This article was originally published in Spanish by Liliana Martínez Lomelí. Translation generated with AI from the original text.
Read in El Economista →