Recently, community refrigerators have appeared on the streets of some of the largest cities in the United States. These are refrigerators made available to anyone who wishes to use perishable food leftovers from others. For example, when a family does not consume all the food they prepared and it remains in good condition, they wrap it, label it with the date of preparation, and deposit it in the community refrigerator, where someone experiencing food insecurity can come and consume what someone else left there.
To a large extent, these refrigerators represent a solution to one of the greatest problems in postmodern societies: food waste, which is not only paradoxical given the existence of people facing food insecurity, but also generates ecological impacts due to the way these foods are produced only to ultimately go uneaten. It is here that these community actions seek to address this deeply rooted problem in first-world societies.
Beyond this, the refrigerators address an issue that is problematic for many people experiencing food insecurity: many do not approach community dining halls due to shame or social pressure associated with scarcity. The refrigerators solve this issue. The fact that anyone can open a refrigerator to take someone else's edible leftovers is not reserved only for those in food insecurity; anyone can take the food. Volunteers and associations responsible for maintaining, cleaning, and organizing these refrigerators emphasize in their experiences that, although it might seem otherwise, the majority of beneficiaries are indeed people facing food insecurity. However, demand for these meals is so high that once a refrigerator is filled with leftovers, it is quickly emptied by people monitoring their availability.
For many, although this option represents an alternative, the reality is that the functioning of this system depends largely on how integrated or disintegrated the social fabric is, as it relies heavily on trust relationships between those offering help and those truly in need. Additionally, among strategies to redistribute wasted food, one concern is that redistribution itself may require resources that generate a carbon footprint with a negative environmental impact. In response, many associations have installed low-energy refrigerators or even refrigerators powered by solar panels.
Beyond the success or failure of this initiative as a long-term proposal to address community food insecurity, it is an example of community action promoted by civil society. As a global trend, collective actions from civil society members have so far shown positive impacts within communities, beyond the negligence of authorities or institutions responsible for reducing citizens' food insecurity. Undoubtedly, there are still many variables to consider within each community for these efforts to work, but the shared experiences also serve as learning opportunities for other contexts.
— This article was originally published in Spanish by Liliana Martínez Lomelí. Translation generated with AI from the original text.
Read in El Economista →